|
Investment Objective
The objective of this fund is to provide long-term capital appreciation through a portfolio of U.S. equities that is sufficiently diversified to minimize risk.
Fund Details
• Fund Inception: October 1, 1998 • Net Assets: $43.3 million • Primary Investments: Mid to large cap U.S. stocks • Distributions: Monthly as required • RRSP eligible
|
Growth of $1,000*†

|
 |
Industry Group Mix

|
|
|
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2008
|
2009
|
|
19.0
|
3.2
|
7.5
|
-30.5
|
23.1
|
4.7
|
9.6
|
9.5
|
-17.7
|
-22.6
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Qtr**
|
6 mo**
|
1 yr
|
2 yr
|
3 yr
|
4 yr
|
5 yr
|
6 yr
|
7 yr
|
10 yr
|
|
-7.9
|
-15.3
|
-22.6
|
-20.2
|
-11.3
|
-6.5
|
-4.4
|
-0.3
|
-5.3
|
-1.0
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
(As a percentage of the total portfolio)
|
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Verizon Communications Inc.
Wyeth
AT&T Inc.
Imperial Tobacco Group PLC
Illinois Tool Works Inc.
IBM Corp.
Philip Morris Companies Inc.
WellPoint Inc.
|
2.2
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.4
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Sector
|
Russell 1000 Index
|
INTEGRA
|
|
Energy
Materials
Industrials
Consumer Discretionary
Consumer Staples
Health Care
Financials
Information Technology
Telecommunication Services
Utilities
|
12.5
3.7
9.9
9.4
12.1
14.7
11.3
18.2
3.8
4.4
|
10.8
1.7
13.3
13.6
7.7
18.5
7.7
17.8
5.0
3.9
|
|
|
|
*Pursuant to securities legislation the fund cannot disclose performance returns prior to the date it commenced offering its units to the public by way of a prospectus. †Growth is calculated based on compounded monthly returns.
**Performance for the quarter and 6 months to March 31 represent the actual total return of the funds for the period, and are not annualized.
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss - Value Manager
Dallas, TX., founded 1979, managing $38.7 billion U.S.
Barrow Hanley’s expertise is managing large-cap equities through a value-oriented research intensive process of identifying securities that are temporarily undervalued.
U.S. equity prices suffered punishing declines throughout the first two months of the quarter, followed by a sharp rally in March, to close down over 10 per cent for the quarter in U.S. dollar terms. Value stocks lagged both growth stocks and the broad market, as measured by the S&P 500 significantly. Value benchmarks were hurt by their much larger weighting in financial stocks and limited exposure to the Technology sector.
Our focus remains on finding individual companies that offer an attractive valuation on potential earnings and companies that have the protection of a dividend yield. Our focus on dividends is based upon long-term results that show that dividend yield represents roughly half of an investor’s return. Because our investment process requires that we remain fully invested and relatively concentrated, we focus less on the near-term valuation of the overall market, and more keenly on finding 40-50 individual companies that are attractively valued. While we have had our fair share of earnings disappointments over the past year, the earnings volatility witnessed last year benefits our investment style of bottom-up, active value over the longer term. First, we do not pay above-market multiples for anticipated growth. Second, our time horizon allows us the opportunity to buy solid companies at low earnings multiples and wait for the market to become more comfortable with earnings prospects.
Atlantic Trust - Growth Manager
Boston, MA., founded 1980, managing $13.0 billion U.S.
Atlantic Trust Pell Rudman uses fundamental research to identify quality mid-cap companies with the capability to produce above-average growth in earnings, cash flow and return on shareholder equity.
While the final return in the first quarter of 2009 was -3.4% for the Russell Midcap Growth Index, it was quite a wild ride to get there. As of the first week in March, the index was down more than 15% year-to-date. A strong rally for the remainder of the month brought returns back to tolerably bad, up from unbelievably awful. Our performance had been ahead of the benchmark going into the March recovery. As is typical, we lag during short, sharp market rises where price gains tend to be relatively indiscriminant relative to company fundamentals. The largest contributors to performance were from the Consumer Discretionary and Energy sectors. Both areas showed good positive returns after being significantly oversold in the prior quarter. The worst sector by far was Health Care.
Currently, U.S. mid-cap growth valuations are at compelling low points. The asset class is now at a multi-decade low in normalized P/E ratios. Mid-cap growth is at a steeper discount to long-term average P/E than any other equity asset class. New purchase activity was noticeably lower in the quarter, as it remains a challenge to find companies whose growth prospects can withstand the overwhelming downturn. There isn’t much of a cohesive theme to the purchases overall. We would note two of the recent additions to the portfolio (General Cable and URS) are heavily involved in infrastructure improvement, which we believe will be a strong theme in the year ahead.
All performance is presented in Canadian dollar terms, gross of investment management fees. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
|